Curious?

We have been studying the universe, its inhabitants, its origin, its conclusion, and everything in between, and we have compiled the most complete philosophy in human history.

The concept is so vast, it’s hard to grasp where to start the explanation.

We will start with the systems we understand. Here is a summary of ethics:

In this system, we have a set of proposed universal definitions which can be used to understand ethics.

1. Order - This is the path of events that supports life, health, truth and property. This list is heirarchal: life supercedes health, which supercedes truth, which supercedes property.

2. Disorder - This is the path of events that destroys life, health, truth and property.

3. A Shared Universe - This gives us an equal playing field to calculate with, where all must abide by the same rules.

4. The role of an Actor - This is the human element we will use in two contexts: as a person, or as the representative of a State.

5. The role of Choice - This is the interaction between an actor's mind and body. Any actor with free will must make choices in life.

6. Truth - This is the use of choice and observation to conform choices as closely as possible to the shared universe. If an untrue choice creates less disorder than an accurate choice, the less true choice is more orderly than the more accurate choice.

7. The role of a State - This is the governmental element we will use in two contexts: as a shared group, and as an Actor of authority when representing the State. In the case of a two-actor state, the chosen leader can be considered the State.

8. The role of a Contract - This is any event requiring the choice of at least one actor. An event without choice is a natural process.

9. The role of Property - This is the collection of natural objects an Actor has been authorized by the State to maintain.

In the shared universe, an actor must make a choice. In this choice, the actor may bring order or disorder. The amount of this order or disorder dictates the completion of the actor's contracts.

To explain, we will establish some minimum expectations from actors and States:

1. An actor has the contract to keep their body alive and healthy. To damage the body adds disorder and shortens life. To preserve the body adds order and sustains life.

2. An actor has the contract to sustain truth. Accurate choices generally create less disorder than inaccurate choices. If truth must be sacrificed to preserve property, the untruth must add less disorder than losing the property.

3. An actor has the contract to respect all other actors' lives, health, and property as well. Damaging their lives, health, or property adds disorder.

For example, an actor may injure another actor, which adds disorder, or the actor may help the other actor heal, which adds order.

4. A State has the contract to respect the actors within itself, and to support their lives, health, truth or property. Failing to do so adds disorder.

5. A State has the contract to respect all other States, and to sustain their lives, health, truth or property. Failing to do so adds disorder.

6. A State has the contract to support its own internal structure. Its actors also have contracts to support this structure.

7. An Actor has the responsibility to support other Actors’ lives before the actor supports the State.

By defining these contracts, we may now move on to the logical interactions between actors, States, and their shared universe.

An actor making a choice will inevitably satisfy or break a contract. An actor choosing to break an orderly contract is choosing disorder.

An actor choosing to sustain a contract is choosing order. If all actors choose order, they conclude the contract honorably.

Some contracts fail to respect others' lives and health. If a contract destroys order, choosing to break that contract restores order.

If an actor restores order by choice, their action can be seen as honorable. If an actor rejects a disorderly contract, that is also honorable.

If one actor breaks any orderly contract with another, that actor must choose to restore the contract, or that actor creates injustice.

If the actor creates injustice, the role of the State is to repair as much of the contract as possible. Inaction sustains injustices.

If the State fails to protect the actors within itself, the actors within have the responsibility of breaking that disorderly contract.

If the State fails to honor the States surrounding it, neighboring States have the responsibility of breaking that disorderly contract.

If actors within a State are honorable and just, and if the State is honorable and just, the orderly State will function indefinitely.